| | | | | | |

Core i5-10300H vs Ryzen 9 3900


Description
The i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3900 is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 246.1 k points while the 3900 gets 687.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 3900 is 2.8 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
870f10
Core
Comet Lake-H
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
12/24
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2019
Mean monothread perf.
69.47k points
74.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
246.07k points
687.5k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10300H
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
15.65k
16.16k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
23.13k
23.75k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.66k
9.32k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.43k
23.17k (x2.03)
TOTAL
55.87k
72.4k (x1.3)

Multithread

i5-10300H

3900
Test#1 (Integers)
26.77k
174.73k (x6.53)
Test#2 (FP)
43.81k
275.63k (x6.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.17k
125.65k (x12.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.91k
44.17k (x3.71)
TOTAL
92.66k
620.18k (x6.69)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10300H
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
27.14k
16.85k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
24.75k
26.03k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.73k
9.54k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.84k
22.55k (x1.9)
TOTAL
69.47k
74.97k (x1.08)

Multithread

i5-10300H

3900
Test#1 (Integers)
105.77k
229.41k (x2.17)
Test#2 (FP)
107.47k
292.81k (x2.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.82k
128.48k (x5.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
36.8k (x4.59)
TOTAL
246.07k
687.5k (x2.79)

Performance/W
i5-10300H
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
2350 points/W
3529 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2388 points/W
4505 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
552 points/W
1977 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
178 points/W
566 points/W
TOTAL
5468 points/W
10577 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10300H
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
6031 points/GHz
3920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5500 points/GHz
6054 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1274 points/GHz
2218 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2632 points/GHz
5243 points/GHz
TOTAL
15437 points/GHz
17435 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4