| | | | | | |

Core i5-10300H vs Ryzen 7 1800X


Description
The i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 1800X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 246.1 k points while the 1800X gets 410.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 1800X is 1.7 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
800f11
Core
Comet Lake-H
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
69.47k points
61.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
246.07k points
410.47k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10300H
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
15.65k
15.11k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
23.13k
23.46k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.66k
5.64k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.43k
17.52k (x1.53)
TOTAL
55.87k
61.72k (x1.1)

Multithread

i5-10300H

1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
26.77k
119.5k (x4.46)
Test#2 (FP)
43.81k
198.79k (x4.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.17k
59.75k (x5.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.91k
11.58k (x0.97)
TOTAL
92.66k
389.62k (x4.21)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10300H
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
27.14k
15.02k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
24.75k
24.26k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.73k
5.53k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.84k
16.26k (x1.37)
TOTAL
69.47k
61.07k (x0.88)

Multithread

i5-10300H

1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
105.77k
122.92k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
107.47k
220.32k (x2.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.82k
59.78k (x2.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
7.44k (x0.93)
TOTAL
246.07k
410.47k (x1.67)

Performance/W
i5-10300H
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
2350 points/W
1294 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2388 points/W
2319 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
552 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
178 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
5468 points/W
4321 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10300H
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
6031 points/GHz
3756 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5500 points/GHz
6065 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1274 points/GHz
1382 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2632 points/GHz
4065 points/GHz
TOTAL
15437 points/GHz
15267 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4