| | | | | | |

Core i5-10300H vs Ryzen 3 2200U


Description
The i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 246.1 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 3.5 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
810f10
Core
Comet Lake-H
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
69.47k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
246.07k points
71.02k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10300H
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.65k
11.54k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
23.13k
19.69k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.66k
4.55k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.43k
3.25k (x0.28)
TOTAL
55.87k
39.03k (x0.7)

Multithread

i5-10300H

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
26.77k
19.25k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
43.81k
36.27k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.17k
10.2k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.91k
3.07k (x0.26)
TOTAL
92.66k
68.8k (x0.74)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10300H
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
27.14k
10.73k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
24.75k
18.15k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.73k
3.99k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.84k
3.89k (x0.33)
TOTAL
69.47k
36.77k (x0.53)

Multithread

i5-10300H

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
105.77k
20.11k (x0.19)
Test#2 (FP)
107.47k
36.87k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.82k
10.74k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
3.31k (x0.41)
TOTAL
246.07k
71.02k (x0.29)

Performance/W
i5-10300H
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2350 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2388 points/W
2458 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
552 points/W
716 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
178 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
5468 points/W
4735 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10300H
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
6031 points/GHz
3157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5500 points/GHz
5338 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1274 points/GHz
1175 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2632 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
TOTAL
15437 points/GHz
10814 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4