Core i5-10300H vs FX 6100
Description
The i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 6100 is based on Bulldozer.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 92.7 k points while the 6100 gets 65.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.4 times faster than the 6100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 92.7 k points while the 6100 gets 65.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.4 times faster than the 6100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
600f12
Core
Comet Lake-H
Zambezi
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/6
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
3x64+6x16 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
3x2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
October 2011
Mean monothread perf.
69.47k points
20.42k points
Mean multithread perf.
246.07k points
65.32k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10300H
6100
Test#1 (Integers)
15.65k
7.15k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
23.13k
6.53k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.66k
2.55k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.43k
4.2k (x0.37)
TOTAL
55.87k
20.42k (x0.37)
Multithread
i5-10300H
6100
Test#1 (Integers)
26.77k
24.5k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
43.81k
23.85k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.17k
13.45k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.91k
3.51k (x0.29)
TOTAL
92.66k
65.32k (x0.7)
Performance/W
i5-10300H
6100
Test#1 (Integers)
595 points/W
258 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
974 points/W
251 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
226 points/W
142 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
37 points/W
TOTAL
2059 points/W
688 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10300H
6100
Test#1 (Integers)
3477 points/GHz
1832 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5141 points/GHz
1673 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1257 points/GHz
653 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2540 points/GHz
1077 points/GHz
TOTAL
12415 points/GHz
5235 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4