| | | | | | |

Core i5-10300H vs i5-1235U


Description
The i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 246.1 k points while the i5-1235U gets 297.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1235U is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
906a4
Core
Comet Lake-H
Alder Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4/8
10/12
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
1x1280+4x2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
69.47k points
81.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
246.07k points
297.46k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10300H
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.65k
23.03k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
23.13k
24.11k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.66k
13.9k (x2.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.43k
12.11k (x1.06)
TOTAL
55.87k
73.15k (x1.31)

Multithread

i5-10300H

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
26.77k
111.78k (x4.18)
Test#2 (FP)
43.81k
124.18k (x2.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.17k
59.87k (x5.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.91k
5.76k (x0.48)
TOTAL
92.66k
301.58k (x3.25)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10300H
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
27.14k
36.73k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
24.75k
22.09k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.73k
11.24k (x1.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.84k
11.58k (x0.98)
TOTAL
69.47k
81.64k (x1.18)

Multithread

i5-10300H

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
105.77k
130.18k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
107.47k
110.21k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.82k
50.76k (x2.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
6.31k (x0.79)
TOTAL
246.07k
297.46k (x1.21)

Performance/W
i5-10300H
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
2350 points/W
8679 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2388 points/W
7348 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
552 points/W
3384 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
178 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
5468 points/W
19831 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10300H
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
6031 points/GHz
8349 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5500 points/GHz
5020 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1274 points/GHz
2555 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2632 points/GHz
2631 points/GHz
TOTAL
15437 points/GHz
18555 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4