| | | | | | |

Core i5-10300H vs i3-1215U


Description
The i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 246.1 k points while the i3-1215U gets 185.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.3 times faster than the i3-1215U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
906a4
Core
Comet Lake-H
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
0.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/8
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x1280+2x2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
10240 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
69.47k points
80.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
246.07k points
185.6k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10300H
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.65k
15.63k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
23.13k
20.2k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.66k
9.94k (x1.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.43k
8.06k (x0.71)
TOTAL
55.87k
53.83k (x0.96)

Multithread

i5-10300H

i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
26.77k
35.72k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
43.81k
56.41k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.17k
25k (x2.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.91k
12.48k (x1.05)
TOTAL
92.66k
129.6k (x1.4)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10300H
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
27.14k
37.56k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
24.75k
21.13k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.73k
11.35k (x1.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.84k
10.31k (x0.87)
TOTAL
69.47k
80.34k (x1.16)

Multithread

i5-10300H

i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
105.77k
73.97k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
107.47k
72.37k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.82k
29.61k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
9.65k (x1.2)
TOTAL
246.07k
185.6k (x0.75)

Performance/W
i5-10300H
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
2350 points/W
4931 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2388 points/W
4825 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
552 points/W
1974 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
178 points/W
643 points/W
TOTAL
5468 points/W
12374 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10300H
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
6031 points/GHz
8535 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5500 points/GHz
4802 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1274 points/GHz
2579 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2632 points/GHz
2343 points/GHz
TOTAL
15437 points/GHz
18258 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4