| | | | | | |

Core i5-10300H vs i3-12100T


Description
The i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 246.1 k points while the i3-12100T gets 330.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-12100T is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
90675
Core
Comet Lake-H
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
69.47k points
93.54k points
Mean multithread perf.
246.07k points
330.62k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10300H
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.65k
22.25k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
23.13k
23.16k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.66k
13.09k (x2.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.43k
13.21k (x1.16)
TOTAL
55.87k
71.7k (x1.28)

Multithread

i5-10300H

i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
26.77k
77.43k (x2.89)
Test#2 (FP)
43.81k
109.08k (x2.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.17k
52.45k (x5.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.91k
8.75k (x0.73)
TOTAL
92.66k
247.71k (x2.67)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10300H
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
27.14k
43.24k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
24.75k
23.76k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.73k
12.67k (x2.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.84k
13.88k (x1.17)
TOTAL
69.47k
93.54k (x1.35)

Multithread

i5-10300H

i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
105.77k
150.28k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
107.47k
126.29k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.82k
45.32k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
8.73k (x1.09)
TOTAL
246.07k
330.62k (x1.34)

Performance/W
i5-10300H
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
2350 points/W
4294 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2388 points/W
3608 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
552 points/W
1295 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
178 points/W
249 points/W
TOTAL
5468 points/W
9446 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10300H
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
6031 points/GHz
10546 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5500 points/GHz
5794 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1274 points/GHz
3089 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2632 points/GHz
3384 points/GHz
TOTAL
15437 points/GHz
22814 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4