Core i5-10300H vs i5-11400
Description
The i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-11400 is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 246.1 k points while the i5-11400 gets 489.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400 is 2 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 246.1 k points while the i5-11400 gets 489.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400 is 2 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
a0671
Core
Comet Lake-H
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
69.47k points
86.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
246.07k points
489.31k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10300H
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
27.14k
31.23k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
24.75k
25.88k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.73k
10.83k (x1.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.84k
18.17k (x1.53)
TOTAL
69.47k
86.11k (x1.24)
Multithread
i5-10300H
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
105.77k
213.85k (x2.02)
Test#2 (FP)
107.47k
195.51k (x1.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.82k
72.06k (x2.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
7.89k (x0.98)
TOTAL
246.07k
489.31k (x1.99)
Performance/W
i5-10300H
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
2350 points/W
3290 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2388 points/W
3008 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
552 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
178 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
5468 points/W
7528 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10300H
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
6031 points/GHz
7098 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5500 points/GHz
5881 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1274 points/GHz
2461 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2632 points/GHz
4130 points/GHz
TOTAL
15437 points/GHz
19570 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4