Core i5-10210U vs Xeon W-2223
Description
The i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the W-2223 is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 145.5 k points while the W-2223 gets 243.2 k points.
Summarizing, the W-2223 is 1.7 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 145.5 k points while the W-2223 gets 243.2 k points.
Summarizing, the W-2223 is 1.7 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
50657
Core
Comet Lake-U
Glacier Falls
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8448 kB
Date
August 2019
October 2019
Mean monothread perf.
55.86k points
59.68k points
Mean multithread perf.
145.51k points
243.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210U
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
23.11k
25.09k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
20.58k
20.76k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.73k
5.07k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.43k
8.76k (x1.18)
TOTAL
55.86k
59.68k (x1.07)
Multithread
i5-10210U
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
65.84k
111.43k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
60.77k
100.2k (x1.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.45k
24.67k (x1.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.44k
6.89k (x1.55)
TOTAL
145.51k
243.18k (x1.67)
Performance/W
i5-10210U
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
4389 points/W
929 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4052 points/W
835 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
964 points/W
206 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
296 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
9701 points/W
2027 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10210U
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
5503 points/GHz
6432 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4900 points/GHz
5324 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1127 points/GHz
1301 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1769 points/GHz
2247 points/GHz
TOTAL
13299 points/GHz
15303 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4