Core i5-10210U vs Xeon Silver 4110
Description
The i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 145.5 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.9 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 145.5 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.9 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
50654
Core
Comet Lake-U
Skylake-SP
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
11264 kB
Date
August 2019
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
55.86k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
145.51k points
281.48k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210U
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
23.11k
18.78k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
20.58k
16.25k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.73k
3.99k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.43k
6.8k (x0.92)
TOTAL
55.86k
45.82k (x0.82)
Multithread
i5-10210U
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
65.84k
133.55k (x2.03)
Test#2 (FP)
60.77k
108.43k (x1.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.45k
30.02k (x2.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.44k
9.48k (x2.13)
TOTAL
145.51k
281.48k (x1.93)
Performance/W
i5-10210U
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
4389 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4052 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
964 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
296 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
9701 points/W
3311 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10210U
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
5503 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4900 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1127 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1769 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
13299 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4