Core i5-10210U vs i7-8665U
Description
The i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-8665U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 145.5 k points while the i7-8665U gets 109.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210U is 1.3 times faster than the i7-8665U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 145.5 k points while the i7-8665U gets 109.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210U is 1.3 times faster than the i7-8665U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
806ec
Core
Comet Lake-U
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2019
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
55.86k points
35.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
145.51k points
109.72k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210U
i7-8665U
Test#1 (Integers)
23.11k
14.38k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
20.58k
13.43k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.73k
2.87k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.43k
4.49k (x0.6)
TOTAL
55.86k
35.19k (x0.63)
Multithread
i5-10210U
i7-8665U
Test#1 (Integers)
65.84k
47.22k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
60.77k
46.99k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.45k
10.08k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.44k
5.42k (x1.22)
TOTAL
145.51k
109.72k (x0.75)
Performance/W
i5-10210U
i7-8665U
Test#1 (Integers)
4389 points/W
3148 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4052 points/W
3133 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
964 points/W
672 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
296 points/W
361 points/W
TOTAL
9701 points/W
7314 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10210U
i7-8665U
Test#1 (Integers)
5503 points/GHz
2996 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4900 points/GHz
2799 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1127 points/GHz
599 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1769 points/GHz
936 points/GHz
TOTAL
13299 points/GHz
7330 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4