Core i5-10210U vs i7-7820HQ
Description
The i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-7820HQ is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 145.5 k points while the i7-7820HQ gets 196.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7820HQ is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 145.5 k points while the i7-7820HQ gets 196.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7820HQ is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
906e9
Core
Comet Lake-U
Kaby Lake-H
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2019
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
55.86k points
55.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
145.51k points
196.55k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210U
i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
23.11k
23.23k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
20.58k
20.13k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.73k
4.57k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.43k
7.92k (x1.07)
TOTAL
55.86k
55.85k (x1)
Multithread
i5-10210U
i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
65.84k
85.54k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
60.77k
87.07k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.45k
20.37k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.44k
3.57k (x0.8)
TOTAL
145.51k
196.55k (x1.35)
Performance/W
i5-10210U
i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
4389 points/W
1901 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4052 points/W
1935 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
964 points/W
453 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
296 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
9701 points/W
4368 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10210U
i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
5503 points/GHz
5956 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4900 points/GHz
5163 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1127 points/GHz
1172 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1769 points/GHz
2030 points/GHz
TOTAL
13299 points/GHz
14321 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4