Core i5-10210U vs i7-6900K
Description
The i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-6900K is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 145.5 k points while the i7-6900K gets 427.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6900K is 2.9 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 145.5 k points while the i7-6900K gets 427.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6900K is 2.9 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
406f1
Core
Comet Lake-U
Broadwell-E
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
20480 kB
Date
August 2019
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
55.86k points
49.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
145.51k points
427.51k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210U
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
23.11k
23.11k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
20.58k
17.84k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.73k
5.34k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.43k
3.47k (x0.47)
TOTAL
55.86k
49.76k (x0.89)
Multithread
i5-10210U
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
65.84k
184.19k (x2.8)
Test#2 (FP)
60.77k
181.2k (x2.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.45k
47.44k (x3.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.44k
14.69k (x3.3)
TOTAL
145.51k
427.51k (x2.94)
Performance/W
i5-10210U
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
4389 points/W
1316 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4052 points/W
1294 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
964 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
296 points/W
105 points/W
TOTAL
9701 points/W
3054 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10210U
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
5503 points/GHz
6247 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4900 points/GHz
4822 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1127 points/GHz
1444 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1769 points/GHz
938 points/GHz
TOTAL
13299 points/GHz
13450 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4