Core i5-10210U vs i7-4702MQ
Description
The i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-4702MQ is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 145.5 k points while the i7-4702MQ gets 145.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210U is 1 times faster than the i7-4702MQ . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 145.5 k points while the i7-4702MQ gets 145.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210U is 1 times faster than the i7-4702MQ . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
306c3
Core
Comet Lake-U
Haswell
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
Socket G3
Cores/Threads
4/8
4 /8
TDP
15 W
37 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2019
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
55.86k points
36.8k points
Mean multithread perf.
145.51k points
145.15k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210U
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
23.11k
18.98k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
20.58k
9.5k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.73k
4.32k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.43k
3.99k (x0.54)
TOTAL
55.86k
36.8k (x0.66)
Multithread
i5-10210U
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
65.84k
74.75k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
60.77k
47.72k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.45k
19.65k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.44k
3.02k (x0.68)
TOTAL
145.51k
145.15k (x1)
Performance/W
i5-10210U
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
4389 points/W
2020 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4052 points/W
1290 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
964 points/W
531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
296 points/W
82 points/W
TOTAL
9701 points/W
3923 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10210U
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
5503 points/GHz
5932 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4900 points/GHz
2968 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1127 points/GHz
1351 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1769 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
TOTAL
13299 points/GHz
11499 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4