Core i5-10210U vs Ryzen 7 5800X
Description
The i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5800X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 145.5 k points while the 5800X gets 558.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X is 3.8 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 145.5 k points while the 5800X gets 558.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X is 3.8 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
a20f10
Core
Comet Lake-U
Vermeer
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
32768 kB
Date
August 2019
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
55.86k points
89.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
145.51k points
558.42k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210U
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
23.11k
24.14k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
20.58k
26.3k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.73k
12.09k (x2.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.43k
26.54k (x3.57)
TOTAL
55.86k
89.07k (x1.59)
Multithread
i5-10210U
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
65.84k
183.54k (x2.79)
Test#2 (FP)
60.77k
237.27k (x3.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.45k
107.95k (x7.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.44k
29.66k (x6.67)
TOTAL
145.51k
558.42k (x3.84)
Performance/W
i5-10210U
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
4389 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4052 points/W
2260 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
964 points/W
1028 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
296 points/W
282 points/W
TOTAL
9701 points/W
5318 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10210U
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
5503 points/GHz
5137 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4900 points/GHz
5596 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1127 points/GHz
2571 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1769 points/GHz
5646 points/GHz
TOTAL
13299 points/GHz
18951 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4