Core i5-10210U vs Ryzen 3 5300U
Description
The i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5300U is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 145.5 k points while the 5300U gets 198.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 5300U is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 145.5 k points while the 5300U gets 198.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 5300U is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
860f81
Core
Comet Lake-U
Lucienne
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2019
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
55.86k points
52.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
145.51k points
198.38k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210U
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
23.11k
15.09k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
20.58k
23.74k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.73k
8.32k (x1.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.43k
5.19k (x0.7)
TOTAL
55.86k
52.35k (x0.94)
Multithread
i5-10210U
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
65.84k
67k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
60.77k
89.94k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.45k
36.84k (x2.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.44k
4.6k (x1.04)
TOTAL
145.51k
198.38k (x1.36)
Performance/W
i5-10210U
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
4389 points/W
4467 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4052 points/W
5996 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
964 points/W
2456 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
296 points/W
307 points/W
TOTAL
9701 points/W
13226 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10210U
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
5503 points/GHz
3972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4900 points/GHz
6246 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1127 points/GHz
2190 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1769 points/GHz
1367 points/GHz
TOTAL
13299 points/GHz
13775 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4