Core i5-10210U vs Athlon X4 950
Description
The i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 950 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 145.5 k points while the 950 gets 99.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210U is 1.5 times faster than the 950. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 145.5 k points while the 950 gets 99.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210U is 1.5 times faster than the 950. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
660f51
Core
Comet Lake-U
Bristol Ridge
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
0 kB
Date
August 2019
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
55.86k points
34.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
145.51k points
99.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210U
950
Test#1 (Integers)
23.11k
12.44k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
20.58k
15.96k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.73k
3.54k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.43k
3k (x0.4)
TOTAL
55.86k
34.93k (x0.63)
Multithread
i5-10210U
950
Test#1 (Integers)
65.84k
40.75k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
60.77k
42.07k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.45k
12.53k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.44k
4.45k (x1)
TOTAL
145.51k
99.8k (x0.69)
Performance/W
i5-10210U
950
Test#1 (Integers)
4389 points/W
627 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4052 points/W
647 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
964 points/W
193 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
296 points/W
68 points/W
TOTAL
9701 points/W
1535 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10210U
950
Test#1 (Integers)
5503 points/GHz
3274 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4900 points/GHz
4199 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1127 points/GHz
931 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1769 points/GHz
788 points/GHz
TOTAL
13299 points/GHz
9193 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4