Core i5-10210U vs A12 9800
Description
The i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 9800 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 145.5 k points while the 9800 gets 100.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210U is 1.4 times faster than the 9800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 145.5 k points while the 9800 gets 100.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210U is 1.4 times faster than the 9800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
660f51
Core
Comet Lake-U
Bristol Ridge
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
Socket AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2X2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
kB
Date
August 2019
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
55.86k points
37.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
145.51k points
100.79k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210U
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
23.11k
13.42k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
20.58k
17.61k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.73k
3.77k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.43k
3.06k (x0.41)
TOTAL
55.86k
37.86k (x0.68)
Multithread
i5-10210U
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
65.84k
40.46k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
60.77k
43.18k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.45k
12.78k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.44k
4.37k (x0.98)
TOTAL
145.51k
100.79k (x0.69)
Performance/W
i5-10210U
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
4389 points/W
622 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4052 points/W
664 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
964 points/W
197 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
296 points/W
67 points/W
TOTAL
9701 points/W
1551 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10210U
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
5503 points/GHz
3195 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4900 points/GHz
4193 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1127 points/GHz
897 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1769 points/GHz
728 points/GHz
TOTAL
13299 points/GHz
9013 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4