Core i5-10210U vs i5-12400F
Description
The i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 145.5 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 2.7 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 145.5 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 2.7 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
90675
Core
Comet Lake-U
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
18432 kB
Date
August 2019
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
55.86k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
145.51k points
399.39k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
23.11k
33.85k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
20.58k
20.33k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.73k
10.51k (x2.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.43k
11.77k (x1.58)
TOTAL
55.86k
76.46k (x1.37)
Multithread
i5-10210U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
65.84k
174.21k (x2.65)
Test#2 (FP)
60.77k
141.31k (x2.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.45k
64.86k (x4.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.44k
19.01k (x4.28)
TOTAL
145.51k
399.39k (x2.74)
Performance/W
i5-10210U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4389 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4052 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
964 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
296 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
9701 points/W
3414 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10210U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5503 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4900 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1127 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1769 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
13299 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4