Core i5-10200H vs Xeon W-2223
Description
The i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the W-2223 is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the W-2223 gets 243.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 1.1 times faster than the W-2223. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the W-2223 gets 243.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 1.1 times faster than the W-2223. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
50657
Core
Comet Lake-H
Glacier Falls
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
35 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1024 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8448 kB
Date
September 2020
October 2019
Mean monothread perf.
67.53k points
59.68k points
Mean multithread perf.
260.38k points
243.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10200H
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
26.37k
25.09k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
23.91k
20.76k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.57k
5.07k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.68k
8.76k (x0.75)
TOTAL
67.53k
59.68k (x0.88)
Multithread
i5-10200H
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
114.08k
111.43k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
114.71k
100.2k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.33k
24.67k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
6.89k (x1.62)
TOTAL
260.38k
243.18k (x0.93)
Performance/W
i5-10200H
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
3259 points/W
929 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3277 points/W
835 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
781 points/W
206 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
7439 points/W
2027 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10200H
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
6433 points/GHz
6432 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5831 points/GHz
5324 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
1301 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2848 points/GHz
2247 points/GHz
TOTAL
16470 points/GHz
15303 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4