Core i5-10200H vs Xeon E5-2667 v3
Description
The i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10200H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10200H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
306f2
Core
Comet Lake-H
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
35 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
20480 kB
Date
September 2020
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
67.53k points
41.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
260.38k points
343.64k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10200H
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
26.37k
20.99k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
23.91k
11.9k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.57k
4.72k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.68k
3.75k (x0.32)
TOTAL
67.53k
41.36k (x0.61)
Multithread
i5-10200H
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
114.08k
172.62k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
114.71k
110.03k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.33k
44.06k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
16.93k (x3.98)
TOTAL
260.38k
343.64k (x1.32)
Performance/W
i5-10200H
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3259 points/W
1279 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3277 points/W
815 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
781 points/W
326 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
7439 points/W
2545 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10200H
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6433 points/GHz
5830 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5831 points/GHz
3305 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
1311 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2848 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
TOTAL
16470 points/GHz
11489 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4