Core i5-10200H vs N100
Description
The i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 2.9 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 2.9 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
b06e0
Core
Comet Lake-H
Alder Lake-N
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
35 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2020
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
67.53k points
36.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
260.38k points
88.29k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
26.37k
15.23k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
23.91k
11.04k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.57k
5.54k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.68k
4.98k (x0.43)
TOTAL
67.53k
36.79k (x0.54)
Multithread
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
114.08k
37.07k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
114.71k
32.57k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.33k
14.75k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
3.9k (x0.92)
TOTAL
260.38k
88.29k (x0.34)
Performance/W
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
3259 points/W
6178 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3277 points/W
5429 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
781 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
649 points/W
TOTAL
7439 points/W
14715 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
6433 points/GHz
4479 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5831 points/GHz
3247 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
1631 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2848 points/GHz
1464 points/GHz
TOTAL
16470 points/GHz
10821 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4