Core i5-10200H vs i5-10210U
Description
Both models i5-10200H and i5-10210U are based on Comet Lake architecture.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the i5-10210U gets 145.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 1.8 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the i5-10210U gets 145.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 1.8 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
806ec
Core
Comet Lake-H
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2020
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
67.53k points
55.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
260.38k points
145.51k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10200H
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
26.37k
23.11k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
23.91k
20.58k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.57k
4.73k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.68k
7.43k (x0.64)
TOTAL
67.53k
55.86k (x0.83)
Multithread
i5-10200H
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
114.08k
65.84k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
114.71k
60.77k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.33k
14.45k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
4.44k (x1.05)
TOTAL
260.38k
145.51k (x0.56)
Performance/W
i5-10200H
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
3259 points/W
4389 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3277 points/W
4052 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
781 points/W
964 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
296 points/W
TOTAL
7439 points/W
9701 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10200H
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
6433 points/GHz
5503 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5831 points/GHz
4900 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
1127 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2848 points/GHz
1769 points/GHz
TOTAL
16470 points/GHz
13299 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4