| | | | | | |

Core i5-10200H vs i7-11800H (ES)


Description
The i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the i7-11800H (ES) gets 709.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 2.7 times faster than the i5-10200H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
806d0
Core
Comet Lake-H
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
24576 kB
Date
September 2020
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
67.53k points
81.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
260.38k points
709.85k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10200H
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
26.37k
30.84k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
23.91k
26.38k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.57k
12.66k (x2.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.68k
11.74k (x1.01)
TOTAL
67.53k
81.62k (x1.21)

Multithread

i5-10200H

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
114.08k
294.86k (x2.58)
Test#2 (FP)
114.71k
280.92k (x2.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.33k
113.9k (x4.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
20.16k (x4.74)
TOTAL
260.38k
709.85k (x2.73)

Performance/W
i5-10200H
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
3259 points/W
6553 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3277 points/W
6243 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
781 points/W
2531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
448 points/W
TOTAL
7439 points/W
15774 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10200H
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
6433 points/GHz
6705 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5831 points/GHz
5734 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
2752 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2848 points/GHz
2552 points/GHz
TOTAL
16470 points/GHz
17744 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4