Core i5-10200H vs Ryzen 7 1700X
Description
The i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 1700X is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700X is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10200H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700X is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10200H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
800f11
Core
Comet Lake-H
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
September 2020
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
67.53k points
56.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
260.38k points
372.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10200H
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
26.37k
13.72k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
23.91k
22.48k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.57k
5.12k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.68k
15.44k (x1.32)
TOTAL
67.53k
56.76k (x0.84)
Multithread
i5-10200H
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
114.08k
110.92k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
114.71k
200.56k (x1.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.33k
54.24k (x1.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
7.01k (x1.65)
TOTAL
260.38k
372.73k (x1.43)
Performance/W
i5-10200H
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3259 points/W
1168 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3277 points/W
2111 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
781 points/W
571 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
74 points/W
TOTAL
7439 points/W
3923 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10200H
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
6433 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5831 points/GHz
5916 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2848 points/GHz
4063 points/GHz
TOTAL
16470 points/GHz
14938 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4