Core i5-10200H vs Ryzen 5 5600H
Description
The i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5600H is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the 5600H gets 255.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 1 times faster than the 5600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the 5600H gets 255.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 1 times faster than the 5600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
a50f00
Core
Comet Lake-H
Cezanne
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2020
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
67.53k points
53.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
260.38k points
255.19k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10200H
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
26.37k
14.34k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
23.91k
17.67k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.57k
6.41k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.68k
14.95k (x1.28)
TOTAL
67.53k
53.37k (x0.79)
Multithread
i5-10200H
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
114.08k
83.58k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
114.71k
119.22k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.33k
48.56k (x1.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
3.83k (x0.9)
TOTAL
260.38k
255.19k (x0.98)
Performance/W
i5-10200H
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
3259 points/W
1857 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3277 points/W
2649 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
781 points/W
1079 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
85 points/W
TOTAL
7439 points/W
5671 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10200H
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
6433 points/GHz
3413 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5831 points/GHz
4207 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
1527 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2848 points/GHz
3560 points/GHz
TOTAL
16470 points/GHz
12707 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4