Core i5-10200H vs Ryzen 5 2400G
Description
The i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 1.3 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 1.3 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
810f10
Core
Comet Lake-H
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2020
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
67.53k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
260.38k points
198.27k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10200H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
26.37k
14.2k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
23.91k
23.23k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.57k
5.35k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.68k
5.18k (x0.44)
TOTAL
67.53k
47.96k (x0.71)
Multithread
i5-10200H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
114.08k
58.24k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
114.71k
105.72k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.33k
28.73k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
5.59k (x1.31)
TOTAL
260.38k
198.27k (x0.76)
Performance/W
i5-10200H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3259 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3277 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
781 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
7439 points/W
3050 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10200H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
6433 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5831 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2848 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
16470 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4