Core i5-10200H vs Ryzen 3 5300U
Description
The i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5300U is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the 5300U gets 198.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 1.3 times faster than the 5300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the 5300U gets 198.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 1.3 times faster than the 5300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
860f81
Core
Comet Lake-H
Lucienne
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2020
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
67.53k points
52.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
260.38k points
198.38k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10200H
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
26.37k
15.09k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
23.91k
23.74k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.57k
8.32k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.68k
5.19k (x0.44)
TOTAL
67.53k
52.35k (x0.78)
Multithread
i5-10200H
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
114.08k
67k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
114.71k
89.94k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.33k
36.84k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
4.6k (x1.08)
TOTAL
260.38k
198.38k (x0.76)
Performance/W
i5-10200H
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
3259 points/W
4467 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3277 points/W
5996 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
781 points/W
2456 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
307 points/W
TOTAL
7439 points/W
13226 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10200H
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
6433 points/GHz
3972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5831 points/GHz
6246 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
2190 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2848 points/GHz
1367 points/GHz
TOTAL
16470 points/GHz
13775 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4