Core i5-10200H vs A12 9800
Description
The i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 9800 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the 9800 gets 100.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 2.6 times faster than the 9800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the 9800 gets 100.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 2.6 times faster than the 9800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
660f51
Core
Comet Lake-H
Bristol Ridge
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
Socket AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2X2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
kB
Date
September 2020
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
67.53k points
37.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
260.38k points
100.79k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10200H
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
26.37k
13.42k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
23.91k
17.61k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.57k
3.77k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.68k
3.06k (x0.26)
TOTAL
67.53k
37.86k (x0.56)
Multithread
i5-10200H
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
114.08k
40.46k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
114.71k
43.18k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.33k
12.78k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
4.37k (x1.03)
TOTAL
260.38k
100.79k (x0.39)
Performance/W
i5-10200H
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
3259 points/W
622 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3277 points/W
664 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
781 points/W
197 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
67 points/W
TOTAL
7439 points/W
1551 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10200H
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
6433 points/GHz
3195 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5831 points/GHz
4193 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
897 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2848 points/GHz
728 points/GHz
TOTAL
16470 points/GHz
9013 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4