| | | | | | |

Core i5-10200H vs i7-1280P


Description
The i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-1280P is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the i7-1280P gets 468.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1280P is 1.8 times faster than the i5-10200H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
906a3
Core
Comet Lake-H
Alder Lake-P
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
4/8
14/20
TDP
35 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x1280+6x2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
24576 kB
Date
September 2020
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
67.53k points
91.45k points
Mean multithread perf.
260.38k points
468.3k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10200H
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
26.37k
39.78k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
23.91k
26.06k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.57k
12.44k (x2.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.68k
13.17k (x1.13)
TOTAL
67.53k
91.45k (x1.35)

Multithread

i5-10200H

i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
114.08k
209.96k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
114.71k
170.21k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.33k
72.04k (x2.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
16.09k (x3.79)
TOTAL
260.38k
468.3k (x1.8)

Performance/W
i5-10200H
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
3259 points/W
7499 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3277 points/W
6079 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
781 points/W
2573 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
575 points/W
TOTAL
7439 points/W
16725 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10200H
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
6433 points/GHz
8287 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5831 points/GHz
5429 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
2592 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2848 points/GHz
2744 points/GHz
TOTAL
16470 points/GHz
19051 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4