Core i5-10200H vs i5-12400F
Description
The i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.5 times faster than the i5-10200H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.5 times faster than the i5-10200H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
90675
Core
Comet Lake-H
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
35 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
18432 kB
Date
September 2020
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
67.53k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
260.38k points
399.39k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10200H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
26.37k
33.85k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
23.91k
20.33k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.57k
10.51k (x1.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.68k
11.77k (x1.01)
TOTAL
67.53k
76.46k (x1.13)
Multithread
i5-10200H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
114.08k
174.21k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
114.71k
141.31k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.33k
64.86k (x2.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
19.01k (x4.47)
TOTAL
260.38k
399.39k (x1.53)
Performance/W
i5-10200H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3259 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3277 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
781 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
7439 points/W
3414 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10200H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6433 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5831 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2848 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
16470 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4