| | | | | | |

Core i5-10200H vs i5-12400F


Description
The i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the i5-12400F gets 512.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 2 times faster than the i5-10200H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
90672
Core
Comet Lake-H
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x1280 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
18432 kB
Date
September 2020
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
67.53k points
88.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
260.38k points
512.23k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10200H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
26.37k
37.79k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
23.91k
24.07k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.57k
12.44k (x2.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.68k
13.71k (x1.17)
TOTAL
67.53k
88.01k (x1.3)

Multithread

i5-10200H

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
114.08k
212.6k (x1.86)
Test#2 (FP)
114.71k
197.81k (x1.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.33k
84.35k (x3.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
17.48k (x4.11)
TOTAL
260.38k
512.23k (x1.97)

Performance/W
i5-10200H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3259 points/W
3271 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3277 points/W
3043 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
781 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
269 points/W
TOTAL
7439 points/W
7881 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10200H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6433 points/GHz
8588 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5831 points/GHz
5471 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
2827 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2848 points/GHz
3116 points/GHz
TOTAL
16470 points/GHz
20003 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4