| | | | | | |

Core i5-10200H vs i7-1195G7


Description
The i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the i7-1195G7 gets 239.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 1.1 times faster than the i7-1195G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
806c2
Core
Comet Lake-H
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1499
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
35 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2020
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
67.53k points
82.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
260.38k points
239.58k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10200H
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
26.37k
30.89k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
23.91k
25.57k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.57k
10.64k (x1.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.68k
15.66k (x1.34)
TOTAL
67.53k
82.77k (x1.23)

Multithread

i5-10200H

i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
114.08k
96.34k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
114.71k
95.75k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.33k
32.29k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
15.2k (x3.58)
TOTAL
260.38k
239.58k (x0.92)

Performance/W
i5-10200H
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3259 points/W
3441 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3277 points/W
3420 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
781 points/W
1153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
543 points/W
TOTAL
7439 points/W
8557 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10200H
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6433 points/GHz
6179 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5831 points/GHz
5115 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
2128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2848 points/GHz
3133 points/GHz
TOTAL
16470 points/GHz
16555 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4