Core i3-370M vs Xeon E5502
Description
The i3-370M is based on Westmere architecture while the E5502 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-370M gets a score of 18.1 k points while the E5502 gets 22.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5502 is 1.2 times faster than the i3-370M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-370M gets a score of 18.1 k points while the E5502 gets 22.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5502 is 1.2 times faster than the i3-370M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20655
106a5
Core
Arrandale
Gainestown
Base frecuency
0.933 GHz
1.867 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.867 GHz
Socket
Socket G1
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/4
2 /2
TDP
35 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
8.49k points
11.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
18.15k points
22.28k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-370M
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
3.4k
4.76k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
2.35k
3.15k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.35k
1.94k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.39k
1.45k (x1.04)
TOTAL
8.49k
11.3k (x1.33)
Multithread
i3-370M
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
7.18k
9.48k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
5.13k
6.3k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.5k
3.86k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.33k
2.64k (x1.13)
TOTAL
18.15k
22.28k (x1.23)
Performance/W
i3-370M
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
205 points/W
118 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
147 points/W
79 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100 points/W
48 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
67 points/W
33 points/W
TOTAL
518 points/W
278 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-370M
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
1419 points/GHz
2549 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
978 points/GHz
1685 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
561 points/GHz
1038 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
580 points/GHz
779 points/GHz
TOTAL
3537 points/GHz
6051 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4