Core i3-370M vs Pentium N3530
Description
The i3-370M is based on Westmere architecture while the N3530 is based on Silvermont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-370M gets a score of 18.1 k points while the N3530 gets 34.6 k points.
Summarizing, the N3530 is 1.9 times faster than the i3-370M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-370M gets a score of 18.1 k points while the N3530 gets 34.6 k points.
Summarizing, the N3530 is 1.9 times faster than the i3-370M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20655
30678
Core
Arrandale
Bay Trail-M
Base frecuency
0.933 GHz
2.167 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.58 GHz
Socket
Socket G1
BGA 1170
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
35 W
7,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
kB
Date
February 2014
Mean monothread perf.
8.49k points
10.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
18.15k points
34.57k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-370M
N3530
Test#1 (Integers)
3.4k
4.86k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
2.35k
2.5k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.35k
1.82k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.39k
1.26k (x0.9)
TOTAL
8.49k
10.44k (x1.23)
Multithread
i3-370M
N3530
Test#1 (Integers)
7.18k
17.22k (x2.4)
Test#2 (FP)
5.13k
8.89k (x1.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.5k
6.89k (x1.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.33k
1.57k (x0.68)
TOTAL
18.15k
34.57k (x1.91)
Performance/W
i3-370M
N3530
Test#1 (Integers)
205 points/W
2460 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
147 points/W
1269 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100 points/W
984 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
67 points/W
225 points/W
TOTAL
518 points/W
4938 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-370M
N3530
Test#1 (Integers)
1419 points/GHz
1884 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
978 points/GHz
967 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
561 points/GHz
707 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
580 points/GHz
488 points/GHz
TOTAL
3537 points/GHz
4047 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4