Core i3-370M vs Core 2 Quad Q6700
Description
The i3-370M is based on Westmere architecture while the Q6700 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-370M gets a score of 18.1 k points while the Q6700 gets 19.8 k points.
Summarizing, the Q6700 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-370M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-370M gets a score of 18.1 k points while the Q6700 gets 19.8 k points.
Summarizing, the Q6700 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-370M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20655
6fb
Core
Arrandale
Kentsfield
Base frecuency
0.933 GHz
2.666 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.666 GHz
Socket
Socket G1
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8192 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
kB
Date
April 2007
Mean monothread perf.
8.49k points
10.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
18.15k points
19.77k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-370M
Q6700
Test#1 (Integers)
3.4k
3.06k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
2.35k
2.74k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.35k
2.56k (x1.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.39k
1.68k (x1.21)
TOTAL
8.49k
10.05k (x1.18)
Multithread
i3-370M
Q6700
Test#1 (Integers)
7.18k
7.28k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
5.13k
5.83k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.5k
5.13k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.33k
1.53k (x0.66)
TOTAL
18.15k
19.77k (x1.09)
Performance/W
i3-370M
Q6700
Test#1 (Integers)
205 points/W
77 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
147 points/W
61 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100 points/W
54 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
67 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
518 points/W
208 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-370M
Q6700
Test#1 (Integers)
1419 points/GHz
1146 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
978 points/GHz
1029 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
561 points/GHz
962 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
580 points/GHz
632 points/GHz
TOTAL
3537 points/GHz
3768 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4