Core i3-370M vs Core 2 Duo T7100
Description
The i3-370M is based on Westmere architecture while the T7100 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-370M gets a score of 18.1 k points while the T7100 gets 12.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-370M is 1.4 times faster than the T7100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-370M gets a score of 18.1 k points while the T7100 gets 12.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-370M is 1.4 times faster than the T7100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20655
6fd
Core
Arrandale
Merom
Base frecuency
0.933 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.8 GHz
Socket
Socket G1
Socket P
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
May 2007
Mean monothread perf.
8.49k points
7.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
18.15k points
12.9k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-370M
T7100
Test#1 (Integers)
3.4k
2.08k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
2.35k
1.86k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.35k
1.86k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.39k
1.25k (x0.89)
TOTAL
8.49k
7.05k (x0.83)
Multithread
i3-370M
T7100
Test#1 (Integers)
7.18k
4.16k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
5.13k
3.73k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.5k
3.73k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.33k
1.28k (x0.55)
TOTAL
18.15k
12.9k (x0.71)
Performance/W
i3-370M
T7100
Test#1 (Integers)
205 points/W
119 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
147 points/W
107 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100 points/W
106 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
67 points/W
37 points/W
TOTAL
518 points/W
369 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-370M
T7100
Test#1 (Integers)
1419 points/GHz
1157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
978 points/GHz
1033 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
561 points/GHz
1034 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
580 points/GHz
692 points/GHz
TOTAL
3537 points/GHz
3916 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4