Core i3-370M vs Core 2 Duo E8400
Description
The i3-370M is based on Westmere architecture while the E8400 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-370M gets a score of 18.1 k points while the E8400 gets 27.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E8400 is 1.5 times faster than the i3-370M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-370M gets a score of 18.1 k points while the E8400 gets 27.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E8400 is 1.5 times faster than the i3-370M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20655
1067a
Core
Arrandale
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
0.933 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
Socket G1
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6144 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
January 2008
Mean monothread perf.
8.49k points
17.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
18.15k points
27.11k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-370M
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
3.4k
3.3k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
2.35k
7.28k (x3.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.35k
2.88k (x2.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.39k
3.83k (x2.75)
TOTAL
8.49k
17.28k (x2.04)
Multithread
i3-370M
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
7.18k
6.3k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
5.13k
13.71k (x2.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.5k
5.32k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.33k
1.78k (x0.76)
TOTAL
18.15k
27.11k (x1.49)
Performance/W
i3-370M
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
205 points/W
97 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
147 points/W
211 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100 points/W
82 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
67 points/W
27 points/W
TOTAL
518 points/W
417 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-370M
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
1419 points/GHz
1099 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
978 points/GHz
2426 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
561 points/GHz
959 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
580 points/GHz
1278 points/GHz
TOTAL
3537 points/GHz
5762 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4