Core i3-370M vs i3-6006U
Description
The i3-370M is based on Westmere architecture while the i3-6006U is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-370M gets a score of 18.1 k points while the i3-6006U gets 47.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6006U is 2.6 times faster than the i3-370M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-370M gets a score of 18.1 k points while the i3-6006U gets 47.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6006U is 2.6 times faster than the i3-370M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20655
406e3
Core
Arrandale
Skylake-U
Base frecuency
0.933 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
Socket G1
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
November 2016
Mean monothread perf.
8.49k points
30.66k points
Mean multithread perf.
18.15k points
67.91k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-370M
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.4k
7.28k (x2.14)
Test#2 (FP)
2.35k
10.51k (x4.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.35k
2.81k (x2.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.39k
2.88k (x2.07)
TOTAL
8.49k
23.48k (x2.77)
Multithread
i3-370M
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.18k
14.98k (x2.09)
Test#2 (FP)
5.13k
23.68k (x4.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.5k
6.37k (x1.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.33k
2.43k (x1.04)
TOTAL
18.15k
47.46k (x2.62)
Performance/W
i3-370M
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
205 points/W
998 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
147 points/W
1579 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100 points/W
425 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
67 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
518 points/W
3164 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-370M
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
1419 points/GHz
3640 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
978 points/GHz
5255 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
561 points/GHz
1404 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
580 points/GHz
1441 points/GHz
TOTAL
3537 points/GHz
11739 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4