Core i3-370M vs Celeron N4020
Description
The i3-370M is based on Westmere architecture while the N4020 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-370M gets a score of 18.1 k points while the N4020 gets 25.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N4020 is 1.4 times faster than the i3-370M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-370M gets a score of 18.1 k points while the N4020 gets 25.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N4020 is 1.4 times faster than the i3-370M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20655
706a8
Core
Arrandale
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
0.933 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
Socket G1
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
35 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x24 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
8.49k points
17.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
18.15k points
25.26k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-370M
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
3.4k
5.14k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
2.35k
7.89k (x3.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.35k
2.87k (x2.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.39k
1.76k (x1.27)
TOTAL
8.49k
17.67k (x2.08)
Multithread
i3-370M
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
7.18k
7.46k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
5.13k
11.61k (x2.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.5k
4.27k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.33k
1.91k (x0.82)
TOTAL
18.15k
25.26k (x1.39)
Performance/W
i3-370M
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
205 points/W
1244 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
147 points/W
1936 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100 points/W
712 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
67 points/W
319 points/W
TOTAL
518 points/W
4211 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-370M
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
1419 points/GHz
1837 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
978 points/GHz
2816 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
561 points/GHz
1026 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
580 points/GHz
630 points/GHz
TOTAL
3537 points/GHz
6309 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4