Core i3-550 vs Celeron N4100
Description
The i3-550 is based on Westmere architecture while the N4100 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-550 gets a score of 41.5 k points while the N4100 gets 40.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-550 is 1 times faster than the N4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-550 gets a score of 41.5 k points while the N4100 gets 40.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-550 is 1 times faster than the N4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20655
706a1
Core
Clarkdale
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1156
BGA1090
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
73 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
kB
Date
May 2010
December 2017
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-550
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
7919
4718 (-40.42%)
Test#2 (FP)
5373
6993 (30.15%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3181
2694 (-15.31%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2720
2810 (3.30%)
TOTAL
19192
17214 (-10.31%)
Multithread
i3-550
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
17202
12541 (-27.10%)
Test#2 (FP)
12718
17994 (41.48%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8714
6709 (-23.01%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2861
3328 (16.31%)
TOTAL
41495
40572 (-2.23%)
Performance/W
i3-550
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
236 points/W
2090 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
174 points/W
2999 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
119 points/W
1118 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
555 points/W
TOTAL
568 points/W
6762 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-550
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
2475 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1679 points/GHz
2914 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
994 points/GHz
1122 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
850 points/GHz
1171 points/GHz
TOTAL
5998 points/GHz
7172 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8