Core i3-540 vs i5-2410M
Description
The i3-540 is based on Westmere architecture while the i5-2410M is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-540 gets a score of 38.9 k points while the i5-2410M gets 36.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-540 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-2410M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-540 gets a score of 38.9 k points while the i5-2410M gets 36.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-540 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-2410M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20655
206a7
Core
Clarkdale
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
3.067 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.067 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1156
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
73 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2010
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
18.27k points
20.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.86k points
38.68k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-540
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
7.65k
7.98k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
5.14k
6.55k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.06k
3.28k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.42k
2.7k (x1.12)
TOTAL
18.27k
20.52k (x1.12)
Multithread
i3-540
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
16.21k
13.66k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
12.04k
13.17k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.28k
7.05k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.33k
3.02k (x1.3)
TOTAL
38.86k
36.9k (x0.95)
Performance/W
i3-540
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
222 points/W
390 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
165 points/W
376 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113 points/W
202 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
32 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
532 points/W
1054 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-540
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
2494 points/GHz
2752 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1676 points/GHz
2258 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
999 points/GHz
1132 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
789 points/GHz
933 points/GHz
TOTAL
5958 points/GHz
7075 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4