Core i3-9100T vs Xeon E5-1620 v2
Description
The i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the E5-1620 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100T gets a score of 147.9 k points while the E5-1620 v2 gets 144.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-9100T is 1 times faster than the E5-1620 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100T gets a score of 147.9 k points while the E5-1620 v2 gets 144.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-9100T is 1 times faster than the E5-1620 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906eb
306e4
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/4
4 /8
TDP
35 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
10240 kB
Date
June 2019
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
60.16k points
34.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
192.88k points
144.57k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-9100T
E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
13.6k
12.55k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
20.58k
12.14k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
4.83k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.8k
4.85k (x0.55)
TOTAL
47.74k
34.37k (x0.72)
Multithread
i3-9100T
E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
50.18k
51.93k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
75.99k
56.7k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.66k
23.81k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
12.14k (x2.95)
TOTAL
147.95k
144.57k (x0.98)
Performance/W
i3-9100T
E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
1434 points/W
399 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2171 points/W
436 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
505 points/W
183 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
118 points/W
93 points/W
TOTAL
4227 points/W
1112 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-9100T
E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3676 points/GHz
3217 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5562 points/GHz
3113 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1286 points/GHz
1238 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2378 points/GHz
1244 points/GHz
TOTAL
12902 points/GHz
8812 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4