Core i3-9100T vs i5-10200H
Description
The i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100T gets a score of 192.9 k points while the i5-10200H gets 260.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 1.3 times faster than the i3-9100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100T gets a score of 192.9 k points while the i5-10200H gets 260.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 1.3 times faster than the i3-9100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906eb
a0652
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
June 2019
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
60.16k points
67.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
192.88k points
260.38k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-9100T
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.89k
26.37k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
21.82k
23.91k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
5.57k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.63k
11.68k (x1.35)
TOTAL
60.16k
67.53k (x1.12)
Multithread
i3-9100T
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
89.4k
114.08k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
81.19k
114.71k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.06k
27.33k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
4.25k (x1)
TOTAL
192.88k
260.38k (x1.35)
Performance/W
i3-9100T
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
2554 points/W
3259 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2320 points/W
3277 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
516 points/W
781 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
5511 points/W
7439 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-9100T
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
6727 points/GHz
6433 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5897 points/GHz
5831 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1304 points/GHz
1358 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2331 points/GHz
2848 points/GHz
TOTAL
16260 points/GHz
16470 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4