Core i3-9100T vs i3-7100
Description
The i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100T gets a score of 192.9 k points while the i3-7100 gets 124.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-9100T is 1.5 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100T gets a score of 192.9 k points while the i3-7100 gets 124.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-9100T is 1.5 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906eb
906e9
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Kaby Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
35 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2019
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
60.16k points
57.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
192.88k points
124.8k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-9100T
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
3.79k
4.01k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
15.65k
16.38k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.59k
5.31k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
3.98k (x0.51)
TOTAL
31.81k
29.69k (x0.93)
Multithread
i3-9100T
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
13.97k
8.1k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
57.83k
38.7k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.03k
12.69k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.35k
3.76k (x0.86)
TOTAL
93.18k
63.24k (x0.68)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-9100T
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
13.74k
14.04k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
19.7k
20.55k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.86k
5.41k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.61k
3.99k (x0.46)
TOTAL
46.91k
43.99k (x0.94)
Multithread
i3-9100T
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
50.5k
30.09k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
72.58k
47.84k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.09k
13.13k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.28k
3.52k (x0.82)
TOTAL
145.45k
94.59k (x0.65)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-9100T
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
13.6k
14.41k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
20.58k
22.38k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
5.45k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.8k
4.96k (x0.56)
TOTAL
47.74k
47.21k (x0.99)
Multithread
i3-9100T
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
50.18k
30.48k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
75.99k
52.08k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.66k
12.97k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
4.56k (x1.11)
TOTAL
147.95k
100.1k (x0.68)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-9100T
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
24.89k
25.53k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
21.82k
22.98k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
5.37k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.63k
3.97k (x0.46)
TOTAL
60.16k
57.86k (x0.96)
Multithread
i3-9100T
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
89.4k
54.73k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
81.19k
53.55k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.06k
12.93k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
3.6k (x0.85)
TOTAL
192.88k
124.8k (x0.65)
Performance/W
i3-9100T
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
2554 points/W
1073 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2320 points/W
1050 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
516 points/W
254 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
5511 points/W
2447 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-9100T
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
6727 points/GHz
6547 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5897 points/GHz
5893 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1304 points/GHz
1377 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2331 points/GHz
1019 points/GHz
TOTAL
16260 points/GHz
14836 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4