| | | | | | |

Core i3-9100T vs i3-2330M


Description
The i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i3-2330M is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100T gets a score of 147.9 k points while the i3-2330M gets 33.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-9100T is 4.4 times faster than the i3-2330M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906eb
206a7
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2019
June 2011
Mean monothread perf.
60.16k points
16.02k points
Mean multithread perf.
192.88k points
33.28k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-9100T
i3-2330M
Test#1 (Integers)
13.6k
5.61k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
20.58k
5.42k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
2.45k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.8k
2.53k (x0.29)
TOTAL
47.74k
16.02k (x0.34)

Multithread

i3-9100T

i3-2330M
Test#1 (Integers)
50.18k
11.99k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
75.99k
11.42k (x0.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.66k
5.8k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
4.07k (x0.99)
TOTAL
147.95k
33.28k (x0.22)

Performance/W
i3-9100T
i3-2330M
Test#1 (Integers)
1434 points/W
343 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2171 points/W
326 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
505 points/W
166 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
118 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
4227 points/W
951 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-9100T
i3-2330M
Test#1 (Integers)
3676 points/GHz
2551 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5562 points/GHz
2465 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1286 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2378 points/GHz
1150 points/GHz
TOTAL
12902 points/GHz
7281 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4