Core i3-9100T vs Ryzen 9 5900X
Description
The i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 5900X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100T gets a score of 192.9 k points while the 5900X gets 840.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 4.4 times faster than the i3-9100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100T gets a score of 192.9 k points while the 5900X gets 840.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 4.4 times faster than the i3-9100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906eb
a20f10
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Vermeer
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
12/24
TDP
35 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
June 2019
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
60.16k points
89.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
192.88k points
840.11k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-9100T
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
24.89k
24.34k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
21.82k
26.8k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
12.12k (x2.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.63k
26.55k (x3.08)
TOTAL
60.16k
89.82k (x1.49)
Multithread
i3-9100T
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
89.4k
263.12k (x2.94)
Test#2 (FP)
81.19k
353.9k (x4.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.06k
159.07k (x8.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
64.01k (x15.09)
TOTAL
192.88k
840.11k (x4.36)
Performance/W
i3-9100T
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
2554 points/W
2506 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2320 points/W
3371 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
516 points/W
1515 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
610 points/W
TOTAL
5511 points/W
8001 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-9100T
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
6727 points/GHz
5071 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5897 points/GHz
5584 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1304 points/GHz
2526 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2331 points/GHz
5530 points/GHz
TOTAL
16260 points/GHz
18712 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4