| | | | | | |

Core i3-9100T vs i5-12500H


Description
The i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100T gets a score of 192.9 k points while the i5-12500H gets 225.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 1.2 times faster than the i3-9100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906eb
906a3
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
4/4
12/16
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
18432 kB
Date
June 2019
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
60.16k points
58.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
192.88k points
225.65k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-9100T
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.79k
6.93k (x1.83)
Test#2 (FP)
15.65k
18.76k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.59k
9.46k (x2.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
8.17k (x1.05)
TOTAL
31.81k
43.33k (x1.36)

Multithread

i3-9100T

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.97k
18.04k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
57.83k
66.78k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.03k
37.55k (x2.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.35k
6.08k (x1.4)
TOTAL
93.18k
128.45k (x1.38)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-9100T
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.74k
21.93k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
19.7k
18.79k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.86k
10.5k (x2.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.61k
8.11k (x0.94)
TOTAL
46.91k
59.33k (x1.26)

Multithread

i3-9100T

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
50.5k
61.07k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
72.58k
86.08k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.09k
41.08k (x2.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.28k
6.02k (x1.41)
TOTAL
145.45k
194.25k (x1.34)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-9100T
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.6k
21.11k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
20.58k
19.61k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
9.53k (x2)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.8k
7.72k (x0.88)
TOTAL
47.74k
57.97k (x1.21)

Multithread

i3-9100T

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
50.18k
61.44k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
75.99k
93.66k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.66k
40.09k (x2.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
6.01k (x1.46)
TOTAL
147.95k
201.2k (x1.36)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-9100T
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.89k
22.61k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
21.82k
17.73k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
9.63k (x1.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.63k
8.4k (x0.97)
TOTAL
60.16k
58.37k (x0.97)

Multithread

i3-9100T

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
89.4k
85.49k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
81.19k
94.93k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.06k
39.15k (x2.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
6.08k (x1.43)
TOTAL
192.88k
225.65k (x1.17)

Performance/W
i3-9100T
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
2554 points/W
1900 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2320 points/W
2110 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
516 points/W
870 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
135 points/W
TOTAL
5511 points/W
5014 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-9100T
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
6727 points/GHz
5025 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5897 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1304 points/GHz
2139 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2331 points/GHz
1867 points/GHz
TOTAL
16260 points/GHz
12971 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4