Core i3-9100 vs M-5Y10c
Description
The i3-9100 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the M-5Y10c is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100 gets a score of 164.8 k points while the M-5Y10c gets 51 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-9100 is 3.2 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100 gets a score of 164.8 k points while the M-5Y10c gets 51 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-9100 is 3.2 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906eb
306d4
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Broadwell-Y
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
65 W
5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2019
October 2014
Mean monothread perf.
66.74k points
22.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
229.2k points
51k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-9100
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
14.81k
7.22k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
22.15k
9.98k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.42k
2.75k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.8k
2.98k (x0.62)
TOTAL
47.17k
22.93k (x0.49)
Multithread
i3-9100
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
52.08k
15.07k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
87.45k
24.8k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.98k
6.68k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
4.46k (x1.05)
TOTAL
164.75k
51k (x0.31)
Performance/W
i3-9100
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
801 points/W
3014 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1345 points/W
4960 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
323 points/W
1335 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
65 points/W
891 points/W
TOTAL
2535 points/W
10200 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-9100
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
3526 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5274 points/GHz
4990 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1289 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1143 points/GHz
1492 points/GHz
TOTAL
11232 points/GHz
11467 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4