| | | | | | |

Core i3-9100 vs Ryzen 5 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition


Description
The i3-9100 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100 gets a score of 229.2 k points while the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition gets 174.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-9100 is 1.3 times faster than the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906eb
810f81
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2019
October 2019
Mean monothread perf.
66.74k points
45.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
229.2k points
174.19k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-9100
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
28.03k
13.77k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
24.5k
22.62k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.73k
4.91k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.48k
4k (x0.47)
TOTAL
66.74k
45.3k (x0.68)

Multithread

i3-9100

3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
107.5k
50.44k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
95.11k
94k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.02k
25.64k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.57k
4.11k (x0.9)
TOTAL
229.2k
174.19k (x0.76)

Performance/W
i3-9100
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
1654 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1463 points/W
6267 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
1710 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
70 points/W
274 points/W
TOTAL
3526 points/W
11613 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-9100
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
6675 points/GHz
3722 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5833 points/GHz
6113 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1365 points/GHz
1326 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2018 points/GHz
1082 points/GHz
TOTAL
15891 points/GHz
12243 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4